A Good Day To Die Hard


Return to list


 A Good Day to Die Hard

If relations between Russia and America were tense before, they will be even more on-edge now than ever before. And we can thank Bruce Willis for that.

Early last year, the fifth (and final?) instalment of the long-running Die Hard series filmed on location in Moscow, Russia. Most of the city centre was shut down and affected for forty days at one point, so the filmmakers could create the epic car chase scene which kick starts the action early on in the film. Now I have seen many car chase scenes on film before, but none that have had so much disregard for innocent drivers and public property than in John McClain’s latest adventure. However, it was an entertaining car chase scene; well shot, extremely well edited and executed and of course, totally over the top. But what else would you expect from a Die Hard movie? But before I get into my review for this latest offering, let’s go back to where it all began…

Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the office building, not a telephone was stirring, not even a fax. The terrorist snuck in to give the staff a scare, and they all hoped a hero would come to be there”.

And a hero was there, but he didn’t know he was their hero…yet. John McClane, a New York City cop, flies into Los Angeles to spend Christmas with his estranged wife. They are on the verge of divorce, but are hoping they can patch thigns up by spending the holidays together. She works in the Nakatomi Plaza Tower in Downtown LA, where the entire staff is gathered for some Christmas drinks and shenanigans. Whilst the party is under full swing, and McClane is in the bathroom, a bunch of angry Germans storm into the building, heavily armed and hell-bent on being bad. The entire building staff, including McClane’s wife, are taken hostage. It’s up to this semi-alcoholic burnout to save the day.

The first Die Hard movie was a huge success. Bruce Willis was already familiar to audiences from his hit TV show “Moonlighting”, but it would be his turn as the guy in the wrong place at the wrong time, which would cement his place in film history. “Die Hard” introduced movie goers to John McClane and also gave us “The Everyman” action hero. Up until then, action films had been overrun by the likes of Schwarzenegger, Stallone and others; tough, muscular, almost indestructible action men who seemed to dispose of the bad guys like they were just swatting flies. But McClane was different; more real. He was clearly out of his depth in this situation, and armed with only a handgun, his wits and a few smart-arse comments, he ploughed his way through the terrorists – one by one – rescued his wife and saved the day. It seemed this action film would be a stand-alone affair, depicting the story of a cop who does his job and walks away, for the most part, unscathed. But it wouldn’t be the only time we’d meet McClane. Over the years, the sequels began to roll in.

“Die Hard 2: Die Harder” came along three years later. This time, Washington Dulles Airport was the setting. It was Christmas Eve, again, and McClane's wife became a hostage, again; only this time, trapped in a plane circulating the skies above Washington because the bad guys were controlling the runways and wouldn’t allow any planes to land. But who would be waiting at the airport and find himself caught in the middle of all this? John McClane of course. The chances of the same thing happening to the guy twice are pretty far fetched, even for the movies. And McClane doesn’t even put this past himself as he utters those exact words in the film. In Die Harder, some rouge terrorists want an ex-military Russian general released from custody for some reason. The plan seems to go off like clockwork, but they didn’t reckon with the cop from New York did they?

Fast forward another three years, and we meet John McClane again. Only this time, it’s on his home turf. “Die Hard: With a Vengeance” was released to the world and many saw this as the best film in the series yet. The plot focused on a mad bomber who likes to play games, his favourite being “Simon Says”. He instructs the police that John McClane can’t have the day off and has to do what Simon tells him to. With a massive hangover and less hair, McClane surfaces and is pulled into a deadly game of cat and mouse with the unknown villain. Along the way, he recruits the help of a small store owner, played to perfection by Samuel L. Jackson. The two become partners for the day, and initially can’t stand each other and It’s the chemistry between Jackson and Willis that carried the film to some very entertaining places. McClane eventually finds out the bad guy pulling the strings this time is actually the brother of Hans Gruber, our bad guy from the first Die Hard. McClane killed Simon’s brother, now Simon wants revenge. Simple right? With his own army of German’s and some nifty explosives, Simon puts McClane through hell, but with sheer dumb luck and those killer wisecracks that can make any bad guy lose the plot, McClane comes out triumphant again. After three movies, it seemed McClane was hanging up his gun and wouldn’t be picked for fighting bad guys again. And so the years rolled past…

Bruce Willis went on to make an assortment of other movies, scoring some big hits but also a few clunkers, but In the mid 00’s, a resurgence was happening in the film industry. Hollywood seemed to be running out of original ideas, so in order to draw in already-established audiences and stick with winning formulas, they resurrected some old movies and classic characters for another swing on the silver screen; Schwarzenegger brought back the Terminator for one last mission, Stallone jumped back in the ring as Rocky for his final bout, so it seemed timely that Bruce Willis should bring his most famous character back to life for another case of “Wrong Guy in the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time” syndrome.

In 2007, “Live Free or Die Hard” or “Die Hard 4.0” as it is also known, hit cinemas. It had been twelve years since McClane fired a gun, and in that time he had settled into a fairly peaceful existence as a lonely cop. His only concerns came with who his daughter Lucy was dating, and McClane would often park his car outside her apartment on stakeouts to suss-out the douche-bags trying to win over his daughter. Times have changed as well, with the advances in technology and the world’s security and law enforcement policies forever changed in a post 9-11 world. But McClane hadn’t changed much – he just looked older and was also completely bolder.

The story this time focuses on the movements of Cyber Terrorists, who try to take over the world with their laptops. It works well, as they are able to shut down America’s traffic system, public transport and power systems with the touch of a button. It’s called a “Firesale”, with the intent of brining down a nations entire infrastructure. In the middle of all this mess is Matt Farrell, a young computer hacker who was hired to write some code for the terrorists to carry out their plan. However, he didn’t know what he was working on and once he’s fulfilled his purpose, the bad guys try to take him out. But the police are onto him for something else and send along one of their own to pick him up. Who you might be asking? McClane of course, and as he goes to retrieve the nerdy young hacker, the bad guys try to take him out. Once again, McClane is thrust into a situation he didn’t ask to be in, and is forced to face some bad guys who are smarter, more equipped and better prepared than anyone he’s faced before “You’re an Amex watch in a digital age” the main villain tells McClane “You’re gonna lose”. This doesn’t deter McClane as he puts up with the card he’s been dealt, and incorporates the help of the young hacker to save the day….again!

So after four instalments and almost twenty years, you’d think McClane must be done. I mean, how many more times can he keep on surviving shit? The guy’s indestructible, and surely his luck would soon run out.

And now, we have “A Good Day to Die Hard”. This time, McClane leaves the US to visit his son, who has been arrested in Moscow for a serious crime. McClane hasn’t seen his son, Jack, for many years and when they are reunited, it’s obvious the lack of contact over the years has done its damage. Jack doesn’t even refer to McClane as dad, simply calling him John. Jack is in the middle of a big situation, working with the CIA on a special mission to bring down a big crime boss. Literally minutes after McClane arrives in Moscow, all hell breaks loose and like it’s just another day at the office, he jumps into the action to help his son fight the bad guys and try and patch things up with him at the same time.

The character of Jack is played by up-and-coming Aussie star Jai Courtney, who audiences will recognise as the sniper from”Jack Reacher”. Courtney is a bit of a cross between Sam Worthington and Russel Crowe in my opinion, and acquits himself well as the gun-toting son of John McClane. This time around however, Bruce Willis seems a bit distant. His character and his reactions to the situation happening around him aren’t so much the focus on this occasion, as it has been in the past. Instead, this fifth instalment drives straight into the action with no hesitation, and relentlessly, gives us car chases, gun fights, helicopter’s attacking, big explosions, more gun fights and the most full-on display of machismo ever displayed in an action film. Just like his father, Jack is an indestructible force, as he and McClane survive one intense action scene after another; after which, they’re always walking away with only a few cuts and bruises, ready for the next fight and all the while, bashing heads as a father and son who don’t have the best history with each other.

The overall look and tone of the film is very different from the previous four. Directed by John Moore this time, the move is gritty, stark and cut in a rough-and-tumble way. The setting is certainly different, the story of the villains and their motivations is often confusing and what felt like the blink of an eye, all of it was over.

So will there be more Die Hard films after this one? I’m not sure. The ending doesn’t determine if this is the end or not, and Bruce Willis has proved he’s still got some swing left in him. Overall, I enjoyed the latest Die Hard offering. The character of John McClane has been around for so long, and the franchise has been well looked after and treated over the years, making it one of the best and most entertaining action series of all time. So if they make another one, I’ll be there. What will they call it then?

“Today is the Day McClane Will Die Hard – For Good” or maybe call it “Just Die Already?” Even action heroes have their limits so unless McClane wants to be shot and killed after surviving so much for so long, he’d do well to just get a desk job at the police station. But then, what kind of a movie would that make? 


No comments:

Post a Comment